• Health Literacy Lab & Library

“Such a Nasty Women” – I’m With Her!

“Such a Nasty Women” – I’m With Her!

Contributor:  Emilie – Hunter College, CUNY

At the third and final debate in Las Vegas tonight, Trump proved his incompetence in front of the nation. Aside from proving that he has no clear ideas on policy or how to run this country, he also demonstrated (unfortunately, not for the final time) that he is a misogynist. On top of all of his ridiculous comments about women’s bodies, the sexual assault accusations against him and confirmed accounts of walking in on teenagers changing, his most shirking moment came as he called Hillary, “such a nasty woman” with a lowered voice, as she was mid-sentence, in front of the entire country.
In this moment, Trump’s true feelings on women could not have come across any clearer—to him, and men like him, women should be seen and not heard. They should only be seen until he wants to look at them, (I’m guessing for Trump this is from about age 15 to 30) and after this there is no place for women in Trump’s world. They should be discarded, kicked out and replaced—on to the next wife.


As Hillary talked about raising taxes on the wealthy and then empowering women through the Affordable Care Act, Trump attempted to overpower her with aggression, saying, “Such a nasty woman,” in a dejected, snarky tone—on two separate occasions. The comment was uttered in a similar way with which he repeated, “it is so sad” or “so bad” throughout the night, in response to everything from the economy to immigration.


Donald Trump is the Zika mosquito in America’s ear. 
His blatant disrespect of women is something we need to keep in check. His brand of misogyny threatens to spill over into policy, taking rights away from all women and setting us back 100 years (when America was “great”). This is the crux of Trump, and why we need to fear all candidates like him. He threatens to take control of a woman’s right to choose with blanket statements and scare tactics, as though abortions happen four days before birth. His followers and the men who think like him are unable to see things beyond black and white, or nasty women and sweet ones.
Unable to compete fairly with Hillary, as he cannot match her record or begin to approach her intellect, Trump reverts to schoolyard bullying tactics, hurling insults that would be considered below the belt in any forum, let alone a national debate. And as he is a disenfranchised male, powerless to his own self-destruction, his only approach is to claim the election is rigged. Woe is Trump.
His other idea? Call Hillary “such a nasty woman” because he cannot match her, because he does not want to have sex with her, and because she is beating him fair and square. Trump is the little boy on the playground, losing to a girl and calling her mean—but not as lighthearted as that. Calling Hillary “such a nasty woman,” not to mention interrupting her mid-sentence, was meant to throw her off her game. That comment was a blatant disrespect of all women, everywhere.

Its digs like this that show—arguably even more than the “pussy grabbing” comments—that he is outwardly hateful of women. Trump is in crisis mode, as he should be. There is no way that American women (and men) are going to stand idly by as his 1940s-style rhetoric of where a woman belongs, or how a woman should behave, goes unchecked. He doesn’t just think Hillary is nasty; he thinks all women not kissing up to him (or letting him kiss them without their consent) are nasty. 

The Hillary Clinton camp is not going to let Trump’s insults go quietly. In a genius turn of events, the campaign immediately bought the site nastywomengetshitdone.com, which redirects to Clinton’s official website. By re-appropriating the term “nasty,” Clinton and women everywhere are asserting that casual sexist lingo is not okay; no, Mr. Trump, you cannot call Hillary “nasty,” or insult Ruth Bader Ginsberg because she does not agree with you. 
If these are the “nasty” women in America, I’m with them! 

Trumptactic Structures: A Linguistic Analysis of the Clinton/Trump Town Hall Debate

This blogpost written by: 

Jon Schwoerer,  Hunter College, CUNY


Some notes on the debate ( Town Hall Oct 9 2016)

– Trump’s extreme misogyny is really on show here. Whenever Clinton spoke, Trump stood right behind her and/or paced back and forth. However, while Clinton often moved around herself and gestured to the audience when she spoke, Trump mostly stood still whenever he spoke. I wonder why Trump didnt move much WHILE he was speaking. Does this also somehow have anything to do with his sexism, or is it just because he isn’t a fine-tuned politician like Hillary is?
– Reading the debate transcript is very interesting. Clinton’s spoken language is carefully scripted and worded. She speaks off the cuff in a way most people would write; in complete, even correctly-punctuated sentences. Trump, on the other hand, throws grammar and sentence structure completely out the window, speaking in mostly sentence fragments. 
– Trump’s language is also much more colorful than Clinton’s. Despite Trump’s limitations as a public speaker, Trump uses lots of descriptive language and imagery in his speech –  “ISIS chopping off heads,” “drowning people in steel cages” etc. He likes similes – “like medieval times,” etc. He calls Hillary “the devil” (“Bernie made a deal with the devil.”). He likes using sarcasm, mockingly “complimenting” her on her record as Secretary of State. He uses lots of gossip and storytelling, even though he is terrible at telling stories. Clinton’s language, on the other hand, is very dry and policy-oriented. 
Much of Trump’s success lies in his descriptive language. Trump uses copious amounts of metaphors, imagery, etc. in order to paint a VISUAL picture of a world in chaos; a picture people can relate to. However, Trumps paints this picture using extremely base and simple language – language that everyone can understand – while simultaneously appealing to people’s direct economic concerns instead of speaking in vague platitudes. This combination allows to Trump to appeal to people on an emotional level rather than a policy or even ideological level; people think Trump is a no-bullshit kind of guy who knows what’s wrong and can fix things. It’s genius.
– Trump had a VERY LOW bar set for him in the debate in light of the leak of the tapes. Trump surpassed said bar in the debate. Clinton had an unfairly high bar set for her (she’s female, considered to be “establishment,” other reasons) and I don’t think she passed that bar in the debate. Trump’s debate performance didn’t lose him any support, and even perhaps gained him a couple votes. I do think the leak of the tapes BY ITSELF (and more damaging tapes maybe being leaked in the future) did hurt Trump’s standing among some, but not enough to knock him out of the race. I still think Trump will win. Upstate New York is completely Trump territory. I was visiting a friend in Kerhonkson a week ago (pretty rural) and EVERY SINGLE SIGN on almost EVERY SINGLE HOUSE WAS TRUMP. Most of the country is like that, if not worse. People in New York City are very isolated from goes on in the rest of America.

©2021. Health Literacy Lab. All Rights Reserved.